Nonprofits Speak Out

March 9, 2018

In response to the Postal Regulatory Commission proposal to allow the USPS to raise postage rates as much as 7 percent a year, or 40 percent in five years, the nonprofit community has spoken out. About 130 individual nonprofits wrote letters to the PRC urging Commissioners Taub, Hammond, Langley, and Acton to reconsider their proposal.

The outpouring of comments from nonprofits is remarkable for several reasons. The Commission normally receives comments from the “usual suspects:” the Postal Service and its unions on one side, and the “mailing industry” on the other. In this case, actual customers who are not normally part of the “mailing industry” have spoken up.

Nonprofit Mail is Unique and Essential

And we are not just any customers. We mail about 15 billion pieces of First Class, Marketing, and Periodicals Mail each year, or one-tenth of all USPS mail volume. And it is not just any mail. It is mail used to provide voluntary funding through millions of donations, large and small, to charities that serve people in need. It is not about self-interest. It is about fulfilling the needs of our society that are otherwise not going to be met by the private sector or the government.

Nonprofit mail is content that the United States Postal Service, as a government monopoly, needs to remain relevant and solvent. It is mail that serves the greater good. It is mail that households like to receive from causes they voluntarily support and identify with as members. And it is mail that “binds the nation together” as much as any type of mail.

Above-inflation increases in postage, as many of the letter-writers verified, will result in almost dollar-for-dollar reductions in the programs, services, and missions of the majority of nonprofits. This is for two very strong reasons.

First, most nonprofits rely on mail to raise the majority of their funding, and do not currently have viable alternatives. Digital is developing but is tiny in comparison to mail in the nonprofit sector.

The second reason is that nonprofits must operate with fixed, limited fundraising budgets, including postage. This is not just good management. It is required by the organizations that rate nonprofits and recommend them to households for donations. If a nonprofit spends in the 25 to 30 percent range for overhead costs, including fundraising, including postage, it risks being delisted as a charity that households should give to.

Virtually all of the 130 letters attested to the fact that the PRC proposal will be a disaster for the charitable sector throughout the United States. We reproduce the PRC links to all of the letters below.

Alliance Makes Strong Arguments for Nonprofits

The Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers also filed extensive comments totaling 137 pages plus library references. With our Board of Directors and membership standing firmly with us, we made unassailable arguments that, in addition to agreeing with the individual nonprofit letters, the PRC proposal is not lawful and it would be a disaster for our nation’s postal system, the mailing industry, and all citizens who use the mail.

We also joined virtually the whole mailing industry in forming the American Mail Alliance and filing joint comments in strong opposition to the PRC proposal. And several Alliance Board member organizations also signed the American Mail Alliance statement.

RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Apostles of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, United States Province
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from St. Pius X, St. Matthias Academy
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from The Production Management Group, Ltd. (PMG)
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from American Lung Association
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Ignatian Solidarity Network
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Friars, Third Order Regular, Province of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Brothers of Christian Instruction
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Sister Servants of the Blessed Sacrament
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Conference of Redemptorists of North America
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Lay Mission-Helpers Association
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Friars, Province of St. John the Baptist
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Susan G. Komen Global Headquarters
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from The Augustinian Provincialate, San Diego, CA
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Scott Wallenfelsz, Society of the Divine Savior (Salvatorians)
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Pallottine Fathers and Brothers, Mother of God Province
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Blessed Sacrament Catholic Community, Burlington, NC
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Congregation of the Blessed Sacrament, Province of Saint Ann
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc.
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Saint Francis Monastery, Franciscan Brothers of Brooklyn
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Consolata Missionaries
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from St. Francis of Assisi School, Seahurst, WA
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of Saint Francis of the Providence of God
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Child Day Care Center
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of the Holy Spirit
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Xaverian Brothers
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Little Sisters of the Poor, Villa Guadalupe
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Society of St. Teresa of Jesus (Teresian Sisters)
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from St. Conrad Friary
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Disabled American Veterans (DAV)
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from St. Ann’s Shrine Congregation of the Blessed Sacrament
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Missionary Society of St. Columban
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Christian Brothers of the Midwest
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Trinity Missions
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Capuchin Franciscans, Western America Province
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from IHM Sisters
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Consolata Missionaries
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Missouri Farm Bureau Services, Inc.
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of Benet Hill Monastery
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from The Abbey of Our Lady of New Clairvaux
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from the Central Association of the Miraculous Medal
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Carmelite Friars, Province of Saint Elias National Shrine of Our Lady of Mount Carmel
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Little Sisters of the Poor, Mullen Home
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Little Sisters of the Poor, Jeanne Jugan Residence
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from Benedictine Sisters of Baltimore, Emmanuel Monastery
RM2017-3 
03/08/2018
Comments Received from the Passionists of Holy Cross Province
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Benedictine Sisters of Chicago
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Daughters of Charity, Province of St. Louise
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of Charity of New York
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Friars, Holy Name Province
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Catholic Campus Ministry at St. Thomas More Newman Center
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Holy Cross Sisters, USA Province
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Little Sisters of the Poor, St. Joseph’s Home for the Elderly
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Oblate Missions, Missionary Association of Mary Immaculate
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Ursuline Sisters of Tildonk
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of Benet Hill Monastery
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Sisters of Christian Charity
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Assumption BVM Province Franciscans
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Joseph’s Home
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Our Lady of Hope Regional School
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from the Marist Brothers
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Sacred Heart Southern Missions
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from National Shrine of St. Jude, Claretian Missionaries
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Congregation of Sisters of St. Agnes (CSA)
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls, Minnesota
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Ursuline Sisters of Mount Saint Joseph
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Passionists of Holy Cross Province
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Adrian Dominican Sisters
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Linda Slosser, Production Manager of Society of the Divine Savior, Salvatorians
RM2017-3 
03/06/2018
Comments Received from Sister Joan Marie Keller, Missionary Servants of the Most Blessed Trinity
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home (Boys Town)
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Sister Kathy Wiesneski
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Sister Deborah Wilson, Missionary Servants of the Most Blessed Trinity
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Daylesford Abbey
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Friars, Province of Saint Barbara
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from World Animal Protection
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Bobby Pantuso, Society of the Divine Savior, Salvatorians
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Sisters of Our Lady of Perpetual Help
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from St. John Paul II Newman Center, University of Illinois at Chicago
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from National Wildlife Federation
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Franciscan Ministries
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments of Mercy Home for Boys & Girls
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, Wilmington-Philadelphia Province
RM2017-3 
03/05/2018
Comments Received from the Redemptoristine Nuns
RM2017-3 
03/02/2018
Comments of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
RM2017-3 
03/02/2018
Comments of Elks Magazine
RM2017-3 
03/01/2018
Comments of St. Labre Indian School
RM2017-3 
03/01/2018
Comments of Production Solutions

RM17-3 

RM2017-3 
02/28/2018
Comments Received from The Christophers

 

RM2017-3 
02/28/2018
Comments Received from Diocese of Joliet, Illinois
RM2017-3 
02/27/2018
Comments Received from National Catholic Development Conference (NCDC)
RM2017-3 
02/27/2018
Comments from the Franciscan Mission Associates
RM2017-3 
02/26/2018
Comments of UNICEF
RM2017-3 
02/26/2018
Comments of United Service Organizations, Inc. (USO)
RM2017-3 
02/22/2018
Comments of Americares
RM2017-3 
02/22/2018
Comments Received from Food for the Poor, Inc.

Co

RM2017-3 
02/14/2018
Comments of Mercy Ships

mments of Mercy Ships

RM2017-3 
01/31/2018
Comments Received from Tennessee Riverkeeper
RM2017-3 
01/31/2018
Comments Received from Black Warrior Riverkeeper
Comments Received from Tennessee Riverkeeper
Comments Received from Black Warrior Riverkeeper
RM2017-3 
11/09/2017
Comments Received from Daughters of St. Paul
RM2017-3 
04/04/2017
Comments Received from PESI
RM2017-3 
03/31/2017
Comments Received from Alzheimer’s Association
RM2017-3 
03/28/2017
Comments Received from American Lung Association
RM2017-3 
03/27/2017
Comments Received from America’s VetDogs
RM2017-3 
03/27/2017
Comments Received from Guide Dog Foundation
RM2017-3 
03/20/2017
Comments Received from Jewish Voice Ministries International
017-3 
03/20/2017
Comments Received from the Association of Direct Response Fundraising Counsel Members
RM2017-3 
03/20/2017
Comments of Wounded Warrior Project
RM2017-3 
03/17/2017
Comments of Poor Handmaids of Jesus Christ Foundation, Inc.
RM2017-3 
03/16/2017
Comments Received from Alzheimer’s Association
RM2017-3 
03/16/2017
Comments Received from Compassion International
RM2017-3 
03/14/2017
Comments Received from American Institute for Cancer Research
RM2017-3 
03/14/2017
Comments Received from Guy Adams, President and CEO of Christian Appalachian Project
RM2017-3 
03/13/2017
Comments Received from Marine Toys for Tots Foundation
RM2017-3 
03/10/2017
Comments Received from the National Catholic Development Conference
RM2017-3 
03/09/2017
Comments Received from The National Children’s Cancer Society
RM2017-3 
03/08/2017
Comments Received from Franciscan Mission Associates
RM2017-3 
03/08/2017
Comments Received from WETA, Public Broadcasting for Greater Washington, D.C.
RM2017-3 
03/06/2017
Comments Received from Angel A. Aloma, Executive Director Food For The Poor, Inc.
RM2017-3 
03/02/2017
Comments Received from Trinity Missions
RM2017-3 
02/27/2017
Comments Received from Oblate Missions
RM2017-3 
02/27/2017
Comments Received from Catholic Charity Appeal
RM2017-3 
02/27/2017
Comments Received from Salesian Missions
RM2017-3 
02/21/2017
Comments Received from Christian Appalachian Project